How We Rate
"HootRated helps parents find books that match their child's reading ability AND emotional readiness. We provide data. You make the decisions."
The Two-Axis Model
Every book on HootRated is rated on two independent axes. This is our core innovation — no other tool rates on both:
Axis 1: Reading Level
How cognitively demanding is the text? Measured as a grade equivalent (K-12), derived from Lexile scores, ML models, and text complexity analysis.
Axis 2: Content Intensity
How emotionally/thematically intense is the content? Measured on a 1-5 scale from Gentle to Very Intense. Not a quality judgment.
Content Intensity Scale
Our 5-level scale is calibrated specifically for children's literature:
Gentle
No conflict beyond everyday childhood experiences. Themes: friendship, family, nature, learning.
Example: Frog and Toad, Goodnight Moon
Mild
Light conflict or tension. Mild peril, temporary sadness, gentle suspense. Characters face challenges but are never in serious danger.
Example: Charlotte's Web, Magic Tree House
Moderate
Real stakes and emotional weight. May include sustained danger, loss of a pet or family member, bullying, divorce, moderate violence in context.
Example: Harry Potter, Percy Jackson
Intense
Heavy themes explored in depth. Death of major characters, graphic war/violence depictions, abuse, discrimination, substance use, intense emotional distress.
Example: The Giver, Number the Stars
Very Intense
Graphic or sustained depictions of trauma. Sexual content, graphic violence, torture, self-harm. Typically YA crossover or shelved incorrectly in children's sections.
Example: The Hate U Give, Speak
Content Descriptors
Every book also gets tagged with specific themes present, using neutral, factual language. These are not judgments — they're descriptions to help you make informed decisions.
Examples include: Loss & Grief, Divorce & Family Change, Bullying, Mild Peril, Fantasy Violence, Identity & Self-Discovery, Romantic Content, War & Conflict.
Our Data Sources
Each rating is generated from multiple independent data sources, never a single opinion:
| Data Point | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Reading Level (primary) | Open Library — Lexile scores | High |
| Reading Level (secondary) | ML model trained on 50K+ books | Medium |
| Reading Level (fallback) | Flesch-Kincaid from description text | Low |
| Content Intensity (base) | AI analysis of book description + subjects | Medium |
| Content Intensity (adjustment) | DoesTheDogDie.com — community-voted warnings | High |
| Content Descriptors | AI extraction + community data + metadata | Medium-High |
Confidence Badges
- High Confidence — Multiple data sources, community verification, full description
- Standard Confidence — Description + subjects available, some verification
- Preliminary — Limited data, clearly labeled for transparency
What We Are NOT
We are not a censorship tool.
- ✗ We never recommend removing books from any library or school.
- ✗ We never treat the existence of diverse characters as "content" to warn about.
- ✗ We never use words like "objectionable," "inappropriate," or "problematic."
- ✗ We never assign moral judgment to any content.
Intensity is not quality. A Level 5 book isn't a bad book. The Kite Runner is brilliant literature. It's also intensely graphic. Both things are true.
Representation is not a warning. A book having a transgender protagonist is tagged under "Identity & Self-Discovery" as a theme, not flagged as a concern.
Context matters. Our analysis considers the work as a whole, not cherry-picked passages. A book about the Holocaust will rate "Intense" for content, but our descriptors explain why — so you can decide if your child is ready for that important topic.
How We Compare
| Feature | HootRated | Common Sense Media | BookLooks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Level | Yes (grade equivalent) | No | No |
| Content Rating | Yes (1-5 scale) | Yes (age-based) | Yes (0-5) |
| Specific Warnings | Yes (community-sourced) | Some | Some |
| Politically Neutral | Yes | Mostly | No |
| Transparent Methodology | Fully transparent | Partially | Opaque |
| Free Access | Yes | Yes | Was free |
Our Commitment
- Transparent methodology — this page exists so you can understand exactly how we work
- Open to feedback — we welcome correction and community input on every rating
- No political affiliation — we serve all parents, regardless of their beliefs
- Data over opinions — multiple sources, never a single reviewer's judgment